The military is an organization formed by the State and its people with the authority to use coercive and lethal force, usually with the use of weapons, to defend its country from actual or perceived external threats. As with any organization, there are certain traits military people and its officers must have for it to be functional. These behaviors are designed to appropriate leadership attributes and core leader competencies pursuant to many Army codes.


Chief among such traits is loyalty. Military people must, at any cost, be loyal to their comrades, and above all, their country. They must respect and follow the constitution, and have a basic understanding of their obligations to the country and the army. Furthermore, sense of duty is held at the highest regard. A professional work ethic must be maintained at all times. This means carrying out jobs or missions with professionalism.


Similarly, military personnel must be honorable and persons of integrity, having a clear sense of the public code of professional Army values. In addition, reliability and trustworthiness are also important qualities. This means showing good moral judgment and behavior, and abiding by basic moral principles. Surely these examples are not exhaustive, but having these values instilled in every military personnel ensures that the entire organization runs smoothly.



This is where a military leadership development program comes in. The leadership program is a training process designed to develop leadership skills in a variety of training environments. Good military leadership programs use an integrated system of structured leadership opportunities to maximize every soldier’s potential and to predict success as an office in the future. Periodically, cadet progress is tracked and individual potential to lead other military personnel is gauged.


The purpose of the Army’s military leadership training is to optimize, synchronize, and produce forces capable of responding to a spectrum of operations. Learning in the military is often a career-long process. Understandably, training and education in the institution and the units cannot meet the needs of every individual. Commanders and other leaders should create an environment that encourages subordinates to maximize self-development.


The discussion and literature on military leadership development programs are vast in number and often lead one to many paths. For governments and academics alike, the solution is to provide a defined and focused approach to a field of study riddled with academic minefields. Especially in the context of stability operations, this requires leadership styles where collaboration is high.

If you have questions, please visit us at for complete details and answers.
Article Source